| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Manually editing interface-changes.rst is a giant maintenance pain that
causes merge conflicts all the time. Stop doing that nonsense and
instead have changes be written to files in DOCS/interface-changes. Also
remove that one sentence in changes.rst because it's just not true.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I'm guilty of violating this, but surely I can't be the only one. 85 is
pretty small and there's plenty of lines in the codebase that go well
over that. Surely nobody programs on tiny screens anymore and the kernel
raised the limit to 100 a few years ago so let's just copy that.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Doesn't really make much of a different in practice aside from us
dropping ancient legacy fallbacks but still.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(The recommendation is to add the document to the project git root, but
I'm against dumping such things into git. I'd rather replace the
Copyright full text files with links and move contribute.md to the wiki
than add the CCoC text as a file.)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I have to say this in PR reviews all the time, so maybe I should make i
explicit. In too many words of course, many, many, too many words which
nobody will read, I get it, now shut up. Sneak in some subtle or not so
subtle comments about how I think that github is ruining code quality.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
People somehow think "should" makes things optional, even though the
wording was merely trying to account for the exception of the rule. I
guess this means programming documents should sound like we're running a
police state (which is also the ultimate outcome of all technological
development, if you weren't aware).
See: #7248
|
| |
|
|
| |
Even if nobody ever reads this file.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Another thing nobody will read, or consciously follow.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Still trying to get people to read it. Even though I wanted to make it
less of a wall of text and more readable, it got bigger. Oops.
While I'm at it, violate my own rules and mix these mostly cosmetic
changes with some actual rule changes and clarifications.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The C11 situation is complicated. For example, MinGW doesn't seem to
have a full C11 implementation, but we pretty much rely on C11 atomics.
Regarding "#pragma once": they say it's not standard because of unsolved
(admittedly valid) issues. Btu still, fuck writing include guards, I
just can't be bothered with this crap.
(Does anyone even read this document?)
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Basically, both the license of the file and the preferred license of the
project (LGPLv2.1+) counts. I'm doing that so that files with more
liberal licenses don't get infected by LGPL, but allow copy & pasting to
LGPL source files without jumping through lawyer bullshit hoops.
Mention this in Copyright too.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
...but that doesn't mean they're not binding. Also, they're made up on
the spot, and probably bad.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Some of this is outdated by years. I don't think we even have
MPlayer-style randomly formatted source files anymore (except
stream_dvd.c).
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Not all tools apply line breaking. Which is probably good, because you
wouldn't be able to put lines in there which should _not_ be broken.
Don't ask me whether there is an "official" git convention for this.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Github will display a link to it when a user wants to create an issue or
pull request.
Also make some minor adjustments to DOCS/contribute.md, which is
developer oriented, and for which I see no reason to merge it with
the new file.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As suggested in #2033.
Additionally, change "LGPLv2+" to "LGPLv2.1+". Since this was always
used with the "and later" phrase, this doesn't require any further
discussion.
Also clarify that the "+" means "or later". This should be clear to
anyone with a brain, but you never know with copyright.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Moved to #mpv and #mpv-devel, respectively. Travis details were also
updated.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit is to prevent changes being merged into upstream, without
being known if it is tested or not.
Signed-off-by: wm4 <wm4@nowhere>
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
The # from the IRC channel made it appear as a headline.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Separate to not confuse git history tracking.
|
|
|
I wonder if this is better. The intention is to make the instructions
for sending patches more visible.
|
