Patch by Stefan Huehner / stefan % huehner ! org \

patch replaces '()' for the correct '(void)' in function
declarations/prototypes which have no parameters. The '()' syntax tell
thats there is a variable list of arguments, so that the compiler cannot
check this. The extra CFLAG '-Wstrict-declarations' shows those cases.

Comments about a similar patch applied to ffmpeg:

That in C++ these mean the same, but in ANSI C the semantics are
different; function() is an (obsolete) K&R C style forward declaration,
it basically means that the function can have any number and any types
of parameters, effectively completely preventing the compiler from doing
any sort of type checking. -- Erik Slagter

Defining functions with unspecified arguments is allowed but bad.
With arguments unspecified the compiler can't report an error/warning
if the function is called with incorrect arguments. -- Måns Rullgård


git-svn-id: svn://svn.mplayerhq.hu/mplayer/trunk@17567 b3059339-0415-0410-9bf9-f77b7e298cf2

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/libvo/vo_aa.c b/libvo/vo_aa.c
index b75d174eec..4e23247bdf 100644
--- a/libvo/vo_aa.c
+++ b/libvo/vo_aa.c
@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ osdpercent(int duration, int deko, int min, int max, int val, char * desc, char
 }
 
 void
-printosdtext()
+printosdtext(void)
 {
   if(osd_text_length > 0 && !vo_osd_text) {
     memset(c->textbuffer,' ',osd_text_length);
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ printosdtext()
 }
 
 void
-printosdprogbar(){
+printosdprogbar(void){
     /* print mplayer osd-progbar */
     if (vo_osd_progbar_type!=-1){
 	osdpercent(1,1,0,255,vo_osd_progbar_value, __sub_osd_names[vo_osd_progbar_type], "");