From abbc09b6045e440d11a5d55fb0e65617dc09ff7e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: diego Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 23:21:05 +0000 Subject: Joe Barr calls us Mplayer. git-svn-id: svn://svn.mplayerhq.hu/mplayer/trunk@12230 b3059339-0415-0410-9bf9-f77b7e298cf2 --- DOCS/xml/en/users-vs-dev.xml | 12 +++++++----- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'DOCS/xml') diff --git a/DOCS/xml/en/users-vs-dev.xml b/DOCS/xml/en/users-vs-dev.xml index 56b536d3d8..f0543c0ac0 100644 --- a/DOCS/xml/en/users-vs-dev.xml +++ b/DOCS/xml/en/users-vs-dev.xml @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ GCC 2.96, and started recommending other compilers. Examples are MySQL, and avifile. -Other interesting links are +Other interesting links are Linux kernel news flash about kernel 2.4.17 and @@ -187,13 +187,15 @@ he quotes his exchange with G that perfectly summarizes the whole situation:
-However, he also went on to say that he was "surprised" by my column about -MPlayer and thought it was unfair, reminding me that it is -a free software project. "If you don't like it," Bartsch said, "you're free not to use it." +However, he also went on to say that he was "surprised" by my column +about Mplayer and thought it was unfair, reminding +me that it is a free software project. "If you don't like it," +Bartsch said, "you're free not to use it."
Almost two years later in october 2003 he wrote another review called -Mplayer revisited. +Mplayer revisited +(wrong spelling preserved). In it he came to the following conclusions:
-- cgit v1.2.3