From 77a9265561a174682bb41b3f7850ef49a630740b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: wm4 Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 20:23:41 +0200 Subject: Copyright: mention that more liberal licenses are ok too In fact, some source files do this. --- Copyright | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'Copyright') diff --git a/Copyright b/Copyright index 500ec00830..51a1a16f90 100644 --- a/Copyright +++ b/Copyright @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ All new contributions must be LGPLv2.1+ licensed, or if the changes are done on GPL code, must come with the implicit agreement that the project can relicense the code to LGPLv2.1+ at a later point without asking the contributor. (This is a safeguard for making potential relicensing of the project to LGPLv2.1+ -easier.) +easier.) Using a more liberal license compatible to LGPLv2.1+ is also ok. For information about authors and contributors, consult the git log, which contains the complete SVN and CVS history as well. -- cgit v1.2.3