From 92be79c98773617866ca60fd2a985d6e6c97b364 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: corey Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 19:26:27 +0000 Subject: add better information about inverse-telecining with vf_filmdint git-svn-id: svn://svn.mplayerhq.hu/mplayer/trunk@26474 b3059339-0415-0410-9bf9-f77b7e298cf2 --- DOCS/xml/en/encoding-guide.xml | 29 +++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/DOCS/xml/en/encoding-guide.xml b/DOCS/xml/en/encoding-guide.xml index c53aa4a37d..ee69383ae4 100644 --- a/DOCS/xml/en/encoding-guide.xml +++ b/DOCS/xml/en/encoding-guide.xml @@ -2244,6 +2244,23 @@ mencoder dvd://1 -oac copy -vf pullup,softskip -ovc lavc -ofps 24000/1001 + + is similar to + : both filters attempt to match a pair of + fields to form a complete frame. will + deinterlace individual fields that it cannot match, however, whereas + will simply drop them. Also, the two filters + have separate detection code, and filmdint may tend to match fields a + bit less often. Which filter works better may depend on the input + video and personal taste; feel free to experiment with fine-tuning + the filters' options if you encounter problems with either one (see + the man page for details). For most well-mastered input video, + however, both filters work quite well, so either one is a safe choice + to start with. + +mencoder dvd://1 -oac copy -vf filmdint -ovc lavc -ofps 24000/1001 + An older method is to, rather than inverse-telecine the telecined parts, telecine @@ -2258,18 +2275,6 @@ mencoder dvd://1 -oac copy -vf softpulldown,ivtc=1 -ovc lavc -ofps 24000/1001 - - I have not used myself, but here is what - D Richard Felker III has to say: - -
It is OK, but IMO it tries to deinterlace rather - than doing inverse telecine too often (much like settop DVD - players & progressive TVs) which gives ugly flickering and - other artifacts. If you are going to use it, you at least need to - spend some time tuning the options and watching the output first - to make sure it is not messing up. -
- -- cgit v1.2.3