| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Also refactors the usage of tex_upload to make ra_tex_upload_pbo a
RA-internal thing again.
ra_buf_pool has the main advantage of being dynamically sized depending
on buf_poll, so for OpenGL we'll end up only using one buffer (when not
persistently mapping) - while for vulkan we'll use as many as necessary,
which depends on the swapchain depth anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- tex_uploads args are moved to a struct
- the ability to directly upload texture data without going through a
buffer is made explicit
- the concept of buffer updates and buffer polling is made more explicit
and generalized to buf_update as well (not just mapped buffers)
- the ability to call tex_upload/buf_update on a tex/buf is made
explicit during tex/buf creation
- uploading from buffers now uses an explicit offset instead of
implicitly comparing *src against buf->data, because not all buffers
may actually be persistently mapped
- the initial_data = immutable requirement is dropped. (May be re-added
later for D3D11 if that ever becomes a thing)
This change helps the vulkan abstraction immensely and also helps move
common code (like the PBO pooling) out of ra_gl and into the
opengl/utils.c
This also technically has the side-benefit / side-constraint of using
PBOs for OSD texture uploads as well, which actually seems to help
performance on machines where --opengl-pbo is faster than the naive code
path. Because of this, I decided to hook up the OSD code to the
opengl-pbo option as well.
One drawback of this refactor is that the GL_STREAM_COPY hack for
texture uploads "got lost", but I think I'm happy with that going away
anyway since DR almost fully deprecates it, and it's not the "right
thing" anyway - but instead an nvidia-only hack to make this stuff work
somewhat better on NUMA systems with discrete GPUs.
Another change is that due to the way fencing works with ra_buf (we get
one fence per ra_buf per upload) we have to use multiple ra_bufs instead
of offsets into a shared buffer. But for OpenGL this is probably better
anyway. It's possible that in future, we could support having
independent “buffer slices” (each with their own fence/sync object), but
this would be an optimization more than anything. I also think that we
could address the underlying problem (memory closeness) differently by
making the ra_vk memory allocator smart enough to chunk together
allocations under the hood.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Runtime untested, because I get this:
[vo/rpi] Could not get DISPMANX objects.
This happened even when building older git versions, and on a RPI image
that hasn't changed in the recent years. I don't know how to make this
POS work again, so I guess if there's a bug in the new code, it will
remain broken.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The vp_w/vp_h variables and parameters were not really used anymore
(they were redundant with ra_tex w/h) - but vp_h was still used to
identify whether rendering should be done mirrored.
Simplify this by adding a fbodst struct (some bad naming), which
contains the render target texture, and some parameters how it should be
rendered to (for now only flipping). It would not be appropriate to make
this a member of ra_tex, so it's a separate struct.
Introduces a weird regression for the first frame rendered after
interpolation is toggled at runtime, but seems to work otherwise. This
is possibly due to the change that blit() now mirrors, instead of just
copying. (This is also why ra_fns.blit is changed.)
Fixes #4719.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Now all GL-specifics of shader compilation are abstracted through ra.
Of course we still have everything hardcoded to GLSL - that isn't going
to change.
Some things will probably change later - in particular, the way we pass
uniforms and textures to the shader. Currently, there is a confusing
mismatch between "primitive" uniforms like floats, and others like
textures.
Also, SSBOs are not abstracted yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Instead of having a mutable ra_tex field (and the only one), move the
flag to struct ra, since we have only 2 tex_upload user calls anyway,
and both want the same PBO behavior. (At first I considered making it
a RA_TEX_UPLOAD_ flag, but why bother. PBOs are a terribly GL-specific
thing, so we can't expect a reasonable abstraction of it anyway.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This requires a silly extension to ra_fns.tex_upload: since the OSD
texture can be much larger than the actual OSD image data to upload, a
mechanism for uploading only to a small part of the texture is needed.
Otherwise, we'd have to realloc/copy the data, just to pad it, and then
pay for uploading the padding too.
The RA_TEX_UPLOAD_DISCARD flag is not interpreted by GL (not sure how
you'd tell GL about this), but it clarifies the API and might be
helpful if we support other backend APIs in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Actually GL-specific parts go into gl_utils.c/h, the shader cache
(gl_sc*) into shader_cache.c/h.
No semantic changes of any kind, except that the VAO helper is made
public again as part of gl_utils.c (all while the goal for gl_utils.c
itself is to be included by GL-specific code).
|
|
|
|
| |
Was missed in the previous changes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In addition to using the new VAO mechanism introduced in the previous
commit, this tries to keep the OSD code self-contained. This doesn't
work all too well (because of the pass and CMS stuff), but it's still
better than before.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reduce this to 1 draw call per OSD pass. This removes the need for some
annoying special handling regarding 3D video support (we supported
duplicating the OSD/subtitles for side-by-side 3D output etc.).
Remove the unneeded texture sampler uniform thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Glitches when resizing are still possible, but are reduced. Other VOs
could support this too, but don't need to do so.
(Totally avoiding glitches would be much more effort, and probably not
worth the trouble. How about you just watch the video the player is
playing, instead of spending your time resizing the window.)
|
|
This is a bit redundant with the name of the directory itself, and not
in line with existing naming conventions.
|