| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
| |
git-svn-id: svn://svn.mplayerhq.hu/mplayer/trunk@18786 b3059339-0415-0410-9bf9-f77b7e298cf2
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
gmail * com<
part 2: cosmetic changes
git-svn-id: svn://svn.mplayerhq.hu/mplayer/trunk@18724 b3059339-0415-0410-9bf9-f77b7e298cf2
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
gmail * com<
part 1: functional changes
git-svn-id: svn://svn.mplayerhq.hu/mplayer/trunk@18723 b3059339-0415-0410-9bf9-f77b7e298cf2
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
patch replaces '()' for the correct '(void)' in function
declarations/prototypes which have no parameters. The '()' syntax tell
thats there is a variable list of arguments, so that the compiler cannot
check this. The extra CFLAG '-Wstrict-declarations' shows those cases.
Comments about a similar patch applied to ffmpeg:
That in C++ these mean the same, but in ANSI C the semantics are
different; function() is an (obsolete) K&R C style forward declaration,
it basically means that the function can have any number and any types
of parameters, effectively completely preventing the compiler from doing
any sort of type checking. -- Erik Slagter
Defining functions with unspecified arguments is allowed but bad.
With arguments unspecified the compiler can't report an error/warning
if the function is called with incorrect arguments. -- Måns Rullgård
git-svn-id: svn://svn.mplayerhq.hu/mplayer/trunk@17567 b3059339-0415-0410-9bf9-f77b7e298cf2
|
| |
|
|
| |
git-svn-id: svn://svn.mplayerhq.hu/mplayer/trunk@14992 b3059339-0415-0410-9bf9-f77b7e298cf2
|
| |
|
|
| |
git-svn-id: svn://svn.mplayerhq.hu/mplayer/trunk@3571 b3059339-0415-0410-9bf9-f77b7e298cf2
|
|
|
git-svn-id: svn://svn.mplayerhq.hu/mplayer/trunk@3395 b3059339-0415-0410-9bf9-f77b7e298cf2
|
