summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/DOCS
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorwm4 <wm4@nowhere>2019-10-01 21:44:57 +0200
committerwm4 <wm4@nowhere>2019-10-01 21:44:57 +0200
commit3bef1190e80aa2a2690620661d06d4d9b9da81a5 (patch)
tree6e18e73dadec9895967d0474a842443f532ee227 /DOCS
parent07d9ca5ee30e6ba31beaae329408997e817eb193 (diff)
downloadmpv-3bef1190e80aa2a2690620661d06d4d9b9da81a5.tar.bz2
mpv-3bef1190e80aa2a2690620661d06d4d9b9da81a5.tar.xz
github: try to get contributors to read contribute.md
How hard can it be? I know contribute.md is a shitty wall of text, but that doesn't make it less important, and each violation will make it take longer by adding another review round anyway. And we really don't need lazy pull requests. If you can't be assed to follow a few simple rules, your code is probably shit or you wanted to be quick and lazy. Why should we accept it? We're the ones who have to maintain it and fix bugs in it, and if the contributor is lazy, the chance of you maintaining it is probably slim as well. On the other hand, WE the maintainers are not obligated to anything. Don't say that though, the first contact doesn't need to be negative. I don't know if the "lazy pull requests" is still too strong, but I can't tell.
Diffstat (limited to 'DOCS')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions