|author||wm4 <wm4@nowhere>||2017-05-11 17:02:43 +0200|
|committer||wm4 <wm4@nowhere>||2017-05-11 17:11:01 +0200|
cache: clarify that copyright will be changed to LGPL v2.1 if possible
Clearly the licensing situation isn't confusing enough. I don't know why that guy insists on LGPLv3.
Diffstat (limited to 'Copyright')
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 1 deletions
@@ -49,6 +49,12 @@ interpreted as that his code can be changed to LGPL only as soon as the "core"
of mpv changes to LGPL. We interpret "core" as something minimal, that can
actually be built and run, with all GPL code disabled.
+Some files are LGPLv3+. This is due to the contributions of a single developer
+going by the SVN username "iive". The chosen license of this project is
+LGPLv2.1+. The affected files will be changed to LGPLv2.1+ at the earliest
+opportunity, for example if his contributions disappear by being replaced
+or removed. All new contributions to these files are implied to be LGPLv2.1+.
LGPL relicensing status:
@@ -222,7 +228,7 @@ LGPL relicensing status:
player/video.c extremely hard
stream/ai_* will stay GPL (TV code)
stream/audio_in.* will stay GPL (TV code)
- stream/cache.c LGPL 3+
+ stream/cache.c LGPLv3+
stream/dvb* must stay GPL